, , , , , , , ,
Patrick Walsh

I like to move it. Move it.

Diamonds, Mayans, Germans, Museums, and Misspellings: Holiday Movie Review Roundup, Part Two

posted Monday, 1 January 2007

APOCALYPTO (B+)

Mel Gibson likes things in your face. He likes big, brutal, all-screaming-all-the-time action. He likes violence, and specifically torture, not just in his directorial efforts like the awesome Braveheart and the not-so-awesome The Adventures of Jesus, but in his acting choices too. Remember he was tortured in the Lethal Weapons, Conspiracy Theory, I could go on. He likes blood and guts and gore. He likes all of these things more than, say, Jews. I think the man has problems.

He is also an undeniably talented filmmaker, and somebody who follows his, er, passions wherever they may lead. Apocalypto is a hardcore revenge movie set in Mayan times, and it is completely nucking futs, in the best possible way. There are some visuals I won't soon forget. There are some great performances by people I took seriously despite the fact that, to quote Wayne's World 2, I found it a trifle unnecessary to see the cracks of their bottoms. And best of all there was creative, beautifully shot, and exciting violence. This thing was chock full of squirting blood, beheadings, heart-ripping-outings, and much, much more.

It was a blast, particularly the final hour of "The Chase," when this turns into Last of the Mohicans meets Home Alone. Sweet.

THE GOOD GERMAN (C+)

 http://msnbcmedia2.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Art/ENTERTAINMENT/Projects/Winter06_MovieGuide/movieguide_winter06_thegoodgerman.hmedium.jpg

What a missed opportunity. Steven Soderbergh is a "one for them, one for me" director, throwing out big-budget, big-star entertainments, and balancing them with smaller experimental films. Trouble is he takes the "one for me" part too literally, and winds up making movies for ONLY him. He's got to find a better balance.

There is a reason a movie starring George Clooney, Cate Blanchett, and Tobey Maguire (giving the movie's best performance, as an incredibly nasty human being), is getting dumped into minimal theaters at the busiest time of the year. Not many people are going to like this movie. I've never seen so many walkouts, and I saw Freddy Got Fingered at the theater.

It's a beautiful looking movie, (just look at that still above), and it was made using only the tools available to 1940's filmmakers, which is a neat touch. It certainly looks like those old movies. But it doesn't feel like them. At all. There is nudity, violence, lotsa the word "Fuck," and I guess the idea is to show you how those old movies would have been if they weren't held back by production codes and things like that. Casablanca with tits. BUT what made those old movies so incredible is that they couldn't fall back on those crutches. Therefore, they had to work overtime to hold a viewer's attention, crafting extra-snappy dialogue and extra-gripping stories. This had neither, despite being written by the awesome Paul Attanasio, who wrote two of the best screenplays of the 90's: Quiz Show and Donnie Brasco.

Everyone walking out of this movie was throwing up their hands saying "I didn't get it!" I really didn't either, though I followed the plot. I don't see why they wouldn't have hammered out a more enjoyable script, made this not just an exercise in style, but a real competitor to those old classics.  Very dull, this is a frustrating film, one to admire but not to love.

THE PURSUIT OF HAPPYNESS (B+)

 http://www.nowtoronto.com/issues/2006-12-14/movie_reviews4-1.jpg

This movie blindsided me. My eyes were already half-rolled when the credits began, I was expecting a schmaltzorama, the usual "inspired by a true story" lameness, full of dramatic speeches, and "Go Get 'Em's!" Instead, I got a very subtle movie that really moved me. I haven't cried in a theater since About Schmidt four years ago, and I almost couldn't believe it when this thing made it happen, almost casually.

Will Smith is really terrific in this, he toned down much of his little tics and wisecracks to play Real Person Chris Gardner, a man who took a huge risk by signing on for an unpaid, make-or-break internship at Dean Whitter. His son (real life and onscreen) is undeniably cute, but you can tell Smith was able to take their onscreen relationship to darker places because it wasn't some child he barely knew.

This does get really grim at times, and that's a wonderful thing. The script by Steven Conrad is really something, he's proven himself to be in pretty much a class by himself at writing feel-good movies that make you feel bad. He wrote last year's insanely underrated The Weather Man, with Nicolas Cage, one of the most miserable Hollywood movies I've seen. That movie made my Ten Best list last year, and this one has a good shot this year. He's a writer to watch.

I may have loved this movie all the more because I can relate, it is always so refreshing to see poor people portrayed onscreen. Living a life where getting a parking ticket can keep you from making rent or buying food, that's where I'm at right now. So much of his struggle had me saying a hearty "Amen, sister!" I really got caught up in his struggle, and this gets all the little details of that kind of life exactly right. Notice the scene where they are cleaning up after dinner and the mother pours the tea left in their glasses back into the pitcher instead of into the sink. It was buried under dialogue, it was a tiny moment, but a perfect one. There's a lot of that here.

I would have cut the very last scene, but other than that, I really loved this movie. I do wish they had ended it with one of those delightful Will Smith raps where he explains scene-for-scene what just happened in the movie.

I'm the poorest there is, I'm the sorest there is, did I say I'm the poorest there is?

NIGHT AT THE MUSEUM (D+)

 http://www.citynews.ca/images/2006-12/dec2406-nightmuseum.jpg

Ugh. I don't want to be an old man here, but remember when kids' movies used to try? What a lame, lifeless piece of crap this is. Robin Williams, I can't take it anymore. Stop it! Just stop it. Owen Wilson, I never thought I'd say this, but same goes for you. I think back to the thrill I felt when I first saw Wilson in Bottle Rocket. I think of how incredibly funny he was in Meet the Parents, how fresh his every line reading felt. Turns out he's got nothing else. Enough of you. That's two lazy shitbombs for you this year, OW, and I know there'll be many, many more in the future.

And Ben. Oh, Ben. How I once loved you. I loved your short-lived TV show, I loved your underappreciated directorial work (Reality Bites, Cable Guy), I loved everything you did, Ben. I really did. I loved Mystery Men, Ben! But you had to appear in five movies a year, didn't you? You had to do the exact same Jewish Hugh Grant schtick in every single one of them, didn't you? And now here you are in a kid's movie. Mark my words, Ben, this is your Jumanji, and it's all downhill from here. I hope you and Robin Williams had a nice long talk on set, because you're about five years away from moving in with him at the Hollywood Hall of Lame. ENOUGH! All of you! Say "No!" for a few years. Enough!

The one good thing about this movie was the guy who has said "No!" to countless movie offers, and was therefore extremely refreshing and funny up on the big screen: the honorable Ricky Gervais. He was clearly returning the favor for Ben Stiller's (admittedly great) appearance on Extras, but you could tell he added his own stuff and kept his dignity.

Ben Stiller and a bunch of CGI animals does not a movie make. If the script's not there, don't start filming.

BLOOD DIAMOND (B)

 http://www.easier.com/myads/images/90309-Blood_Diamond.jpg

A very solid action movie that eventually gets bogged down its message. Edward Zwick directed the incredible Glory, but let's not forget that he directed one of my least favorite movies of recent years, The Last Samurai. And though he keeps this hard-edged and exciting throughout, he can't help but throw in a syrupy, insanely irritating ending that nearly ruins everything that came before. Zwick loves that shit. I acted out on the most recent podcast the finale of The Last Samurai, where the Emporer (I think it was the Emporer) is asking about his son (I think it was his son) and says "I want you to tell me how he died."

And Tom Cruise looks up all solemn-like and says: "No. I'll tell you how he lived!"

I choked back so much vomit. Looked around, everyone crying. Horrible. This ends with something pretty similar, one of those movie "slow claps" turning into a standing ovation, and it's a damn shame, because everything before it is tense, violent, scary, and fun.

I laughed EVERY TIME DiCaprio spoke in the trailer for this movie, it seemed to be one of the biggest accent mistakes since Keanu Reeves in Devil's Advocate. Or Keanu Reeves in Bram Stoker's Dracula. Or Keanu Reeves in...I'll stop. BUT believe it or not, it sounds unnatural at first, but he sticks with it and it worked for me, though I'll admit I don't really know how men from Zimbabwe talk. He was great here, and Djimon Hounsou was very strong as well.

Another big problem is that despite Jennifer Connelly's ridiculous hotness, the love story doesn't work, and nowhere does it work less than when DiCaprio is talking about how his father was decapitated and his mom was raped...and it works as pillow talk. Um...ew.

MAYBE a movie about the exploitation and slaughter of thousands of Africans doesn't need a romance. Just saying.

I would like to say I think Jennifer Connelly has gone to #1 on my "To Do" List. After this and especially Little Children, I can't think of her without pitching a tent.

Hey, you know what movie she was really sexy in? That screwball comedy Requiem For A Dream. That descent into complete moral degredation...HOT! Ass to ass indeed!

tags:                                  

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit




1. Mike left...
Tuesday, 2 January 2007 4:11 am

You liked Mystery Men? What is the matter with you?


2. JJ left...
Tuesday, 2 January 2007 9:20 am

Mel Gibson is a great filmmaker / artist, however, he does seem to have a Howard Hughes vibe to him. The problem with Mel is that he's also an American-Celebrity, and that leads us to this question: When do we start to take him (celebrities) seriously, outside of their artistic works. I believe the answer is, once they run for office - Governator-style! That's when we need use our brain cells and analyze their 'real-world' actions / words.

I've been on the fence about Will Smith's latest vehicle, but based on your review - I'm in.


3. RØB left...
Tuesday, 2 January 2007 10:04 am :: http://www.pancakeproductions.net

I'll come to your defense on the MYSTERY MEN thing; usually when people start goin' on about the best comic book-to-movie transitions in history, I think of about five movies immediately; this (along with DICK TRACY, for certain) is one of them.

As for my LIVEJOURNAL!: Pretty sure I pointed out its locale (or at very least, its existence) long, long ago (I have been a reader of this blog like since entry #1 after all) in a comment.

{RESEARCHING...}

Yes, it was in Entry #4, entitled BABY GOT BACKPACKS! I even touted the trivia community that I moderated thereupon (which died back in January 2006 around when I got this job, but which has recently seen some buzz 'n' interest and my be resurrected before long?), http://trivia-rockout.livejournal.com ! Anyway, one of my motives for trying ever since late July of 2005 (that's nearly a year and a half ago now) to get you to join LJ is because like 90% of my entries are what LJ calls "friends-only," whereby only people (with LJ accounts) to whom you have given special permission will be able to read 'em. Obviously I'd have no problem giving, say, YOU permission to read 'em all (743 entries dating back to May of 2000), but there are some (most) that are, ahem, a little sensitive I guess? And mostly I think, where you write yours largely for an audience to read, I'm mostly making them for myself and my close friends, so its shit other people wouldn't necessarily even find particularly interesting or entertaining or anything. Pretty EMO, I know.

Anyway whenever you're ready to upgrade your blog to one that doesn't force spaces into URLs and (it is also interesting to note that LJ is the 71st most visited site on the internet whereas blog-city is the 11,498th), lemme know and we can totally be LJ FRIENDS!

Also (prepare for another spaced-out broken-up link URL), did you ever see http://www.mcnblogs.com/mcindie/archives/2006/12/the_real_chris.html ? That, and the misspelling in that movie's title (yes, I know why it was misspelled, and I'm no more compelled to see it therefore--in fact TO QUITE THE CONTRARY!), lead me to believe that the chances of my ever bothering to see it are between negligible and nonexistent.

I'd rather see the inevitable porno remake, THE PURSUIT OF HAP'S PENIS, where that's concerned.


4. Patrick Walsh left...
Tuesday, 2 January 2007 11:23 am

Mike,

"Mystery Men" was fantastic. Great cast, great jokes, great. If there's something the matter with me, it is that I am a man of incredible taste.

JJ,

I have a feeling old Mel might have a little trouble running for office!

Rob,

Thank you for coming to my defense on "MM." I am already working on a script for "Hap's Penis." I can't watch the Chris Gardner video at work, but what was with your issue with it? I read the description...


5. BrooklynCaaah left...
Tuesday, 2 January 2007 12:57 pm

Too bad you don't live in my neighborhood. We see Jennifer Connelly constantly. Eating dinner, breast feeding...I'm tired of her.


6. Patrick Walsh left...
Tuesday, 2 January 2007 1:10 pm

Is it weird that the thought of her breast feeding makes me feel all foxy inside? Oh, to be that newborn!


7. RØB left...
Tuesday, 2 January 2007 7:03 pm :: http://www.pancakeproductions.net

The problem with the video is that Gardner goes on a tirade about how he can't get a taxi as a black man in Chicago (which is ironically all told from the back seat of a taxi cab). Essentially the video undergoes a crescendo which climaxes with Gardner frustratedly telling all white people to go fuck themselves. Of course this follows him pulling out $550 in cash, making no small point of showing off and expounding on his great wealth, his wonderful and millions-of-dollars-producing job, the Ferrari that he owns and tools around with on weekends, the fact that one time he was carrying around $250,000 in his pocket, and more. I've never been, and hope/expect never to be, a homeless black man with a son, and obviously I've got as much respect as anybody does (or more) for a guy who overcame all odds to make something (big) out of nothing (at all), and I'm a sucker for an underdog story like you might not even believe (to a fault, even), but as a member of the human race I would traditionally expect a more humble and less vindictive outpouring from a dude who came up from nothing, or whatever. Surely the man could exercise some damned modesty given what he's seen and what he's been able to accomplish.

Now, enter the hate mail.


8. Jackson left...
Wednesday, 3 January 2007 2:45 am

BrooklynCaaaah, you live in the Slope! And if you've seen the lady breast feeding, I'm guessing you've been to the Tea Lounge. Whereabouts do you live?


9. Patrick Walsh left...
Wednesday, 3 January 2007 1:47 pm

Rob,

Well, it doesn't effect my enjoyment of the movie. I still haven't watched the video, but why were they filming this man in a cab? Maybe he was grandstanding for the cameras? I don't know. When I get money, I'll probably walk around screaming at people and kicking dogs, I can't say I blame the guy for wanting to get a little revenge on the world.

As always, I ask...has anyone seen ANY of these movies? Any thoughts?


10. RØB left...
Wednesday, 3 January 2007 5:05 pm :: http://www.pancakeproductions.net

Yeah I saw NIGHT AT THE MUSEUM, it was just some kids movie, you came down pretty hard on it given what it was...maybe you had high expectations or something...I enjoyed it, myself. Hell if it makes a kid (or anyone else) watching it think a museum is cool, bonus.


11. Patrick Walsh left...
Wednesday, 3 January 2007 5:20 pm

I'll admit, I rarely see kids' movies, and when I do, my expectations are extremely low and rarely exceeded. I just thought with this cast, (Stiller, Wilson, Paul Rudd, Steve Coogan, Gervais...) SOMETHING would click for me, but it didn't. I don't know why movies for kids all have to be so lazy, as though kids don't deserve quality entertainment, too.

Seems to me when I was a kid, they just made better stuff, although maybe that's just because I was a dumb kid. But even when I revisit stuff now that I loved then, it's still awesome. Home Alone, for example.


12. RØB left...
Wednesday, 3 January 2007 5:37 pm :: http://www.pancakeproductions.net

Oh also regarding TPOH, I feel relatively confident that, given any single movie, I could be happy goin' the rest of my life without seeing it. Hell it's probably more an inconvenience to bother with it than anything; not goin' outta my way to NOT see it, but you can bet I won't mess around with poppin' it in the trusty ol' VCR myself. I'm sure it's harmless or whatever, but why waste my time seein' some movie about that asshole when I can see a movie with lots of girls with huge boobs or a dragon that enslaves earth or something that's all awesome in it?


13. Patrick Walsh left...
Wednesday, 3 January 2007 6:13 pm

Some would consider the triumph of the human spirit awesome, but oh well. I can't fault a man for wanting to see huge boobs. As for the dragons, are we talking about "Eragon" here?


14. RØB left...
Wednesday, 3 January 2007 8:16 pm :: http://www.pancakeproductions.net

What's "Eragon"? I'm just talking about awesome dragons enslaving mankind in general, or like a ninja warrior and a samurai battling it out, or dudes in hot rods listening to heavy metal music. You know, just...awesome stuff.

Triumph of the human spirit, fine and awesome; racism (spoken or unspoken), not so fine or awesome.


15. JJ left...
Wednesday, 3 January 2007 10:22 pm

OK, I've got to jump into this Happy-ness / racism stuff. I have not seen the movie yet. However, I have read several movie reviews, and I watched an a CNBC interview last weekend. The thing that I like about the reviews, including Pat's is that they focused on CLASS, not RACE.

I believe (as do many professors)that the working-class white man has more in common with the working-class black man than with...Donald Trump. Essentially, you have the working-class, middle-class, upper-class... and within those classes there are even more categories: The Upper Upper-Class, Middle Upper-Class, and Lower Upper-Class, and so forth.

I don't want to get too deep here, and sure as hell don't want to dust off my Social Theory 401 book, but I can tell you that in the corporate world, I've met all types of people. Race is the last factor that I care about or relate too - consciously or subconsciously (I think). I usually try to figure out what department he or she is in, and then money comes into play, are they brown bagging it (like me), or taking out the corporate credit for lunch. There is a hierarchy in Corporate America, for better or worse. I've had blacks, whites, browns, males, females, etc for managers and as coworkers. It's all about the Benjamin's baby... that's what separates us, not race per se. Money simplifies... it clarifies... errr-ahhh.

Anyway, during the interview on CNBC he mentioned that he did deal with some racism. This guy started out as low level stock-broker (sales). For those of you who do not work in Corporate America and/or sales it requires some thick skin, and when it comes to sales, there is a lot of bull-shitt'n, and a lot of piss'n contests. You can fall flat on your face or make some fat-ass dough.

This guy had one client in Texas that he would call, and 'this guy would tell him nigger jokes for a few minutes and then tell him to buy 5,000 share of that stock you were talking about.' He laughed at his n-jokes all day, as long as he could take his money o the bank and buy food for his kid.

It's tough call, and he's received a lot of flak from the black community. I guess you could say that he had 'sold-out', but... what if he had not laughed at those n-jokes? ... Well, the racist Texas business would have bought the shares from someone else, and his sales numbers would have sucked, and the sales manager would have fired him, and his kid has no food.... Anyway.... I'm sick of typing.

To summarize, I'm glad to hear that a movie has decided to focus on class instead of race for a change.


16. JJ left...
Wednesday, 3 January 2007 10:43 pm :: http://wsjr.cnbc.com/transcripts/1217200

BTW: I don't like dropping the n-word, just semi-quoting Chris Gardner --- check out the pdf for the CNBC / WSJ transcript link.


17. RØB left...
Thursday, 4 January 2007 4:24 pm :: http://www.pancakeproductions.net

I wasn't saying that TPOH had anything to do with race. Not having seen it I can't comment, but I wasn't trying or wanting to anyway...I'm more talking about the video I posted a link-to above as a poor reflection on the man whose blockbuster-film-version life story (apparently) touts him highly, and using it as a(nother) excuse not to see a movie I had no intention of seeing in the first place.


18. JJ left...
Friday, 5 January 2007 11:07 am

Rob, it seems to be a slow week for PW's blog. So, I'll engage you for a bit... The video that you posted does touch on the subject of race, so that's why I brought up the race issue - but its all good, and we are probably spending too much time discussing a Smith-family project.

Pat, the reason I (and some of your readers) can't comment on all of these new movies - some unreleased at the time of your review - is because we don't have all of you Hollywood connections!