, , , , , , , ,
Patrick Walsh

I like to move it. Move it.

Apologies, Reviews...Murder?

posted Friday, 30 March 2007
There's no murder, I just wanted to grab your attention with a spicy headline.

Due to some sort of Internet Explorer glitch, I can no longer write on this site at "work." This sucks for you loyal readers, because, ironically, "work" is the only place where I have free time. (The only thing I really "do" at "work" is walk twice a day through the office carrying a folder full of construction paper. This way people see me and think, "He's walking somewhere with a folder. This guy must be busy!") When I get home, I am tired, I have lots of other, more pressing writing to work on, and let's face it -- maintaining this body isn't easy. I'm busy.

So I'm sorry, and starting next week I'm going to work something out to get more posts up. In the meantime, I hope you're checking out my stuff at Cinematical, I just posted my first feature: My Favorite Comedy Villains.

I was linked to today by a site I love: mattzollerseitz.blogspot.com . Thank you so much for that, Matt, made my week. Mr. Seitz is one of my favorite writers, a film critic for the New York Times, and he was once one of two finalists for the Pulitzer Prize for criticism. So let's just say this is a more prestigious nod than my shout-out from chickswithdicks.com. (Not that I don't appreciate the shout-out, CWD, and keep those nasty, nasty shots coming).

I'm way backed up on my movie reviews, so to dip my toe in the water, here's reviews of three comedies. They should leave Mr. Seitz feeling very secure in his abilities.

KNOCKED UP (A)

 http://www.worstpreviews.com/images/knockedup.gif

Knocked Up isn't set to be released for two months, but the advance buzz would have you believe this movie invented laughter. It is a very, very funny movie, but aside from some gut-busters scattered throughout, it's "chuckles of recognition" funny as opposed to "spleen-ripping hilarity" funny. To get the comparison out of the way, it probably doesn't pack half the laughs of Judd Apatow's previous film, The 40 Year Old Virgin, my favorite comedy of recent years. What it does, and what Virgin did, is something far more difficult than just make you laugh, it creates characters who look and talk exactly like real people. It creates characters who are presented with completely recognizable, understandable situations, and who deal with them in completely recognizable, understandable ways. If that makes the film sound boring, let me stress that it is not.

The plot is simple. Immature stoner Seth Rogen (who must be more unattractive than I thought, judging by the groans and near-screams from the females in the audience every time he took his shirt off), has a one night stand with the gorgeous, career-minded Katherine Heigl. She gets pregnant. She decides to keep it. They decide to give a relationship a try. That's it, really, but it's all in the telling. This is a whole movie comprised of nothing but great moments. Every scene works. Every performance is excellent and natural and perfect. Harold Ramis is in it. I don't know what else I can tell you.

Knocked Up is a heartfelt, highly emotional movie that just about everyone should relate to. The friendships and relationships here feel like your friendships and relationships, and the romance doesn't hinge on ridiculous and forced complications. It is not a funnier movie, but it is a far more adult and confident film than 40YOV. No one is making superior, more honest comedies right now than Judd Apatow. This movie is really something special. Go see it.

Oh wait, you can't! It's not out yet! God, I'm cooler than you are! 

BLADES OF GLORY (C+)

 http://www.worstpreviews.com/images/bladesofglory.gif

And then there's Blades of Glory. Held up to the extreme care and precision that obviously went into Knocked Up, this movie looks even lazier than it is. And make no mistake, it's mighty lazy.

First, the positive. Will Ferrell is extremely funny as Chazz Michael Michaels, particularly in the movie's first half. Much like Chris Farley could have gone on wringing laughs out of his "Fatty Falls Down" routine forever, Ferrell's "Angry Drunk" might never go out of style. There is a scene where he is playing a wizard in a children's ice show that left me breathless. But the man can only do so much, and he should only be expected to do so much. Amy Poehler and Will Arnett are hilarious actors, but when their first scene falls absolutely flat, you know you're in for trouble. One of the worst things a comedy can do is render funny people unfunny, and this movie does it again and again.  Craig T. "You moved the headstones but you didn't move the bodies!" Nelson is wasted, 40 Year Old Virgin's Romany "You're putting the pussy on a pedastal" Malco is wasted, and on and on down the line.

But the movie's biggest problems are the amazingly bland performances of Jon Heder and Jenna Fischer. Heder did a great job as Napoleon Dynamite, but maybe that should be it for the guy. He is a complete void here, sucking laughs out of every scene he's in. I defy you to even smile at anything Heder does or says in this movie. There may have been no saving School For Scoundrels (D), but Heder certainly didn't help matters. If he's not stopped now, he's going to ruin much better comedies than these in the future. As for Fischer, she's harder to criticize. Her work on The Office is a masterpiece of minimalism, but somebody should have told her that style of acting wasn't going to translate to a big-budget/big-star comedy where everyone's firing on all cylinders. She is genuinely dull here, and her romantic scenes with Heder are punishing. And why do we give a shit about them? They meet, talk for a few seconds, and suddenly the whole plot is hinging on a romance between them that never really exists onscreen? It gives new meaning to the word "forced."

Worth a rental for Ferrell, but pair it with hooch.

I THINK I LOVE MY WIFE (C)

 http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/070313/070313_lovemywife_hmed_12p.hmedium.jpg

I Think This Movie Wasn't Very Good. Chris Rock is unquestionably one of the top 5 stand-ups working today. But movies aren't his thing, and he needs to face that. If you take away the fact that he's Chris Rock and with that comes some presence, the guy is a really bad actor. He's also a weak screenwriter and a terrible director. He wrote this with Louis CK and the fact that these two very funny men have struck out several times on film now should teach them to either stick with what they know or pair with someone who knows.

Rock's got no one to blame either, this is his vision, the way he wanted it to go. I saw Rock on Charlie Rose the other night talking about how Woody Allen's work, particularly Hannah and Her Sisters, was a big influence on this film. I'll buy that he used Allen as an influence, but it looks as though he studied the disastrous "comedies" Allen's been making for the last ten years instead of his classics. Rock is straining so hard to be taken seriously here that he seems to forget he's making a comedy. Joke after joke reaches its logical punchline place, and then…doesn't deliver a punchline. It's almost like he's scared to be funny, like he doesn't realize a movie can do both things. It's the kind of movie where, while watching it, you're forced to come up with better jokes on your own.

And if it wasn't bad enough that he wasted not one but two of my favorite actors from The Wire (Wendell Pierce and Michael K. Williams), he had to go and commit the ultimate movie crime: wasting Steve Buscemi. Even Sandler doesn't waste Buscemi! Don't bring the greatest living character actor on board and give him nothing to do! Buscemi doesn’t get one moment or scene to shine, he spends the whole film asking Rock to go to lunch. He's supposed to be this womanizer, but they don't have any fun with that at all. What's the point of telling us a character is sleazy and then not having him do anything sleazy? It's a comedy, right? Right?

I don't know, and Rock doesn't either. This movie is a tonal disaster, lurching from serious to slapstick like a drunk, and succeeding at neither. When the ending rolls around, (I'll just say that there is singing), it is so misguided, so embarrassing, so against everything that came before it, so painful to watch that I actually had to turn away. How can a man this funny have such terrible instincts for comedy?

tags:        

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit




1. Dale left...
Friday, 30 March 2007 7:27 am

Pat I also suggest in looking busy you take the george costanza approach and everytime someone comes around you just look really stressed out. Hell maybe you'll even get to go out with some "Bastards" from texas.

P.S. Love the spot on villains, why is every bowling movie just absolute hillarity?


2. RØB left...
Friday, 30 March 2007 9:23 am :: http://www.pancakeproductions.net

Is there a way to do an RSS feed of just YOUR Cinematical articles?

I want to read them, but that's basically the only way I'm going to manage/bother to read ALL of them (via RSS feed, specifically at LiveJournal). Good work on the comedy villains article; you definitely nailed the bigs there.


3. Leah left...
Friday, 30 March 2007 1:00 pm

I'm really looking forward to Knocked Up. And I have a thing for Seth Rogen. But I also used to have a crush on Philip Seymour Hoffman so clearly I don't have my finger on the pulse (in the groin??) of my generation.


4. Patrick Walsh left...
Friday, 30 March 2007 1:12 pm

Dale,

Believe me, I use something from the Costanza repertoire at least a couple times a day.

Rob,

If you just want to tell me how to DO an RSS feed or even what an RSS feed IS, I'd be happy to. As for right now, there's the link to all of my entries that I posted a few entries back, it's always updated.

Leah,

If only more girls had your taste in men!

By the way, you can take your "groin" talk elsewhere, this is a family site.


5. JJ left...
Friday, 30 March 2007 3:21 pm

Sounds like the IT dept is cracking down at your job – sucks.

I saw a preview for ‘I Think I Love My Wife’ at the cinema and on television – I had to shut the TV off for a few moments and breathe deeply. Based on the previews – I have the impression that ‘Rock loves his wife, but damn SHE NEVER wants to have sex’ – blah.

Let me tell you something about long-term relationships, especially marriage – it goes in cycles. Some weeks she’s horny – some weeks you're horny - and some weeks you’re both horny (what a glorious time). And sometimes, you keep it in the holster for a while. And if Chris Rock does not get that across in his flick - then he is lame.

I think too many writers that work on these movies, plays, and TV shows are folks who have never been married or never had a lady for longer than a month - nothing wrong with that, but don’t tell me jokes about marriage.


6. RØB left...
Friday, 30 March 2007 4:21 pm :: http://www.pancakeproductions.net

6+7? These arithmetic problems to post comments in your journal are getting to be THOUGHT-PROVOKING!

Just kidding. I was almost a math major, I can't wait 'til blog-city implements calculus problems in order to post comments.

I don't know if Blog-City has a "friends page" option but my understanding is, it does not (this is by no means conclusive). LiveJournal has this option, and using this option, you can look at a single page that contains the entries, in reverse chronological order, of everyone whose diary you add as a friend. This makes it so that you don't have to visit every one of your friends' livejournals to read about their lives--you can go to a single page and read 'em all with ease! And if someone who never updates, finally does so, you don't have to miss it because you never go to their blog because they never update.

You can also add "RSS feeds" for non-LJ-blogs and other things, such as news sites, to your friendlist, and these entries/articles/comics/whatever, or at least a title and brief overview including a hyperlink to the actual sites where the content is hosted (such as http://patrickwalsh.blog-city.com/whatever-entry-was-just-added) will appear so you can go to it and read the whole thing. This is super-handy cuz I can read all of my LJ friends' diaries, as well as all of my non-LJ-friends' online diaries, in one place, as well as all of my favorite comics on the web, news articles, humor sites, and so forth without having to memorize URLs or anything. I get notified when they update, and can either read the content posted right on that page, or easily click on a link to get to it (or, if I want to, completely ignore it!).

RSS feeds, to clarify, are basically what allows me to see when you (or some other non-LJ user) has posted an update (or the update itself; different sites have different policies on RSS). I could get new Onion articles this way, or CNN top stories, my favorite comic strips, and other such stuff (in addition to non-LJ-friend-blog-entries), and again: it's all on the same URL at LiveJournal. It basically cuts in half (or less) the number of URLs that I have to memorize (or otherwise/at least the number of URLs I have to remember to visit). Is this making sense? I'm kinda rambling and hope I didn't overlook some crucial bit of information.

Usually there is some line of URL code that includes rss.xml in the source HTML code of a page that will tell you what you need to implement this. I didn't see anything for specifically your Cinematical entries. The code suggests it would be http://www.cinematical.com/bloggers/patrick-walsh/rss.xml but unlike http://www.cinematical.com/rss.xml - there is no content there. I don't really want to (or in any case, don't have the time!) to read everyone's entries at Cinematical, and sifting through them to get to yours seems like a slight nightmare. So, I thought maybe someone at Cinematical (the webmaster?) would know if there was a way to do RSS feeds of specific writers' articles. If you don't know offhand, you might wanna ask someone there next time you're asking someone there anything else, or submitting an article or whatever, cuz you've got at least one person who'd do a little more Cinematical readin' if this was an option for ya.

Lemme know if you can find out anything from the good people at Cinematical.


7. -M left...
Friday, 30 March 2007 10:56 pm :: http://www.heteroerotica.blogspot.com

HEY! Watch your mouth when you subtly slam Pootie Tang. -M


8. JJ left...
Sunday, 1 April 2007 9:13 pm

perhaps you should add a cinematical link to your 'sites I love' section. Gotta look out for yourself.


9. Patrick Walsh left...
Monday, 2 April 2007 12:40 pm

Rob,

I will give all that a shot.

M,

First ten minutes of "Pootie Tang" were incredible, the rest was a complete mess.

JJ,

I've had a link to cinematical in my "Blogs I Love" section from day one.


10. Bryan left...
Monday, 2 April 2007 1:00 pm

Yeah, I'd say that Knocked Up is the best movie I've seen so far this year. What's really amazing is that, even though it's slightly over two hours (long for a comedy) it never drags and kept me totally engaged the entire time. So many wonderful scenes. (The one with the bouncer might've been my favorite). And even though it's obvious that the movie has to end with a birth scene, Apatow even manages to make that original by adding a few insert shots that we normally don't get to see in Hollywood movies. Man, this movie was so honest, funny and moving.

Yeah, Heder really is anti-matter on screen.


11. JJ left...
Monday, 2 April 2007 1:33 pm

Oh, my bad. However, I think Rob and some other readers are very lazy and when we click on the cinematical link we want that sucker to go right to PW's posts - hence the lookn' out for yo-self... now if you don't mind... it is baseball season and March Madness ends tonight - so I'm off to more important websites!


12. Leah left...
Monday, 2 April 2007 4:35 pm

p.s. Thoughts on the new Arcade Fire album? I haven't gotten my groin-tainted mitts on it yet.


13. RØB left...
Tuesday, 3 April 2007 8:07 pm :: http://www.pancakeproductions.net

JJ, I'm not only so lazy that I want to go straight to Walsh's work ("the good stuff"), I'm a step lazier, insofar as I want it to come to me. Hopefully it can be done; the source code of Cinematical's website suggests that MAYBE it's a possibility. HERE IS HOPING!

Also Pat, if you want me to contact someone at Cinematical to see what's up with that, I could. I'm not sure why I wasn't considering that an option earlier...to whom should I send the pestering E-Mail? Obviously it's me that's a lazy jerk and you're busy enough, so a name and an E-Mail address should suffice; I can contact 'em about all this technical mumbo-jumbo.