Today, three movies dealing with politics and Iraq. Oh, and two of them star my "twins"!
GRACE IS GONE (B-)

Written and directed by James C. Strouse (writer of Steve Buscemi's similarly low-key but far superior Lonesome Jim), Grace is Gone tackles a huge subject in the smallest way possible. John Cusack's wife dies in Iraq. He takes his two young daughters (both wonderfully played) on a road trip and tries to summon the courage to tell them about the tragedy. That's the movie. And at the risk of sounding callous, it's not enough for a movie. I understand that people are dying in Iraq, and that is terrible. I understand that those who die have families and that it is an extreme strain on those families. But how is dragging out telling your kids some bad news for an hour and a half an interesting story?
If it were a great character study, awesome, but it isn't that either. Cusack wears doofy glasses and a few extra pounds, but they can't help him disappear into the character. It is always obvious that he is Acting (with a capital "A"), and he never really nails what should be a slam-dunk role for him.
It's a reasonably entertaining (if that's the right word) film, and yet the movie is just an 85 minute emotional tease, then 5 minutes of the money shot (with tears the desired ejaculate, though I didn't come), then the credits. It's something like emotional pornography, and, like porn, it left me feeling more than a little empty inside.
LIONS FOR LAMBS (B)

Grace is Gone is an Iraq movie that barely mentions Iraq. Lions for Lambs is an Iraq movie that screams Iraq, again and again. Grace is Gone ultimately doesn't try to do enough, Lions for Lambs tries to do a bit too much. Matthew Michael Carnahan's script for Lambs is heavily influenced by Aaron Sorkin (good Aaron Sorkin, thankfully), so naturally there's a lot of speechifying and chest-beating and schmaltz. Carnahan also wrote The Kingdom, another of this year's lackluster Iraq dramas, and Lambs is certainly more successful, if only because it knows what it wants to say.
Unfortunately, it kind of wants to say everything. If this were a documentary, I'd praise it for being fair and balanced. But it isn't, and I wish it had more of a point of view instead of just presenting all sides and saying "So...?". The movie rotates between three segments. In the first, Meryl Streep plays a journalist interviewing a Republican Senator (Tom Cruise -- in full condescending douchebag Magnolia mode, which always brings out his strongest work). In the second, Robert Redford (who also directed) plays a professor talking with a student who is not realizing his full potential. In the third, two of Redford's old students (Derek Luke and Michael Pena) do battle in Afghanistan.
The acting is sharpest in the Streep/Cruise segment. The Redford/student segment is the most effective -- its points about the political laziness of our generation feel very fresh, true, and well thought out. The third segment ultimately goes nowhere. The whole thing is a bit wishy-washy, and a bit of a mess, but it's frequently pretty smart, it's wonderfully short (under 90 minutes!), and even though it can't quite decide what it wants you to think -- at least it wants you to think.
THE MIST (A)

Who would have thunk that the best political movie of the three (and perhaps 2007) is the one with the tentacles and giant bugs?
Stephen King, who wrote the short story the film is based on, is the greatest horror writer of all time (really), and Frank Darabont (The Shawshank Redemption, The Green Mile) is one of a few filmmakers (Rob Reiner in his prime would be another) who knows how to do King. They are served by an outstanding cast. Thomas Jane does a fine job of playing a man who wants to be a hero, but also doesn't want to scare his young son. Marcia Gay Harden gives one of her best performances playing a real loon, a frightening representation of religion gone wrong. For once, Harden dials down the hysterics, and her work is all the more chilling for it. Everyone else, right down to the smallest role, is terrific. There's a great cast of character actors on board, a whole lot of "Oh, that guy! I love that guy!" folks are in this movie.
The setup is fairly simple -- a bunch of people in a small town lock themselves in a grocery store, because there's a mist a-brewin'. But as a terrified townsperson yells on his way into the store, covered in blood -- "There's something in the mist!" There's lots of things, really! And thank God the movie doesn't waste a lot of time trying to explain the hows and whys. "There's something in the mist!" That's all you need to know. Now just hold on and have a blast.
First and foremost, The Mist is a massively entertaining horror movie. It's so much fun, the characters and relationships are extremely well drawn, and it's fucking scary. When the gang is about to take a trip to the pharmacy -- get ready to cover your eyes. The film, and that pharmacy sequence in particular, is a masterful mixture of suspense and gross-out. The movie reminded me of one of my very favorite horror films -- John Carpenter's remake of The Thing (a movie which gets a visual shout-out early in The Mist, for those paying close attention). It's got that same Thing recipe, which is just perfect for horror: take characters you love, put them in a claustrophobic situation, ratchet up the tension, and add in equal dollops of big scares, disgusting moments, dry humor, and human drama. And the humans in this story, as in The Thing, are just as scary as the monsters.
You can take The Mist at face value and have one hell of a time. But if you dig deeper, you'll be greatly rewarded and disturbed. At first everyone thinks the Harden character is nuts, but as the situation in the store gets worse, more and more people are swayed by her religious conviction. She becomes their ruler, even though some in the store don't share her self-righteous beliefs. So when she starts making "Christian" life altering/risking/taking decisions for everyone, based on her faith alone -- that's pretty messed up, no? The film shows how vulnerable people can be when they're scared, how they'll believe anything, especially when it's shrouded in religious furor. Sound familiar? And it surely can't be coincidence that the first person she encourages the crowd to offer up for sacrifice is a soldier, one who was only doing his job. Hits pretty close to home. And there's more, much more, if you want to look for it. If you don't want to think politics in a monster movie, have fun being scared! It's a win-win!
All that and -- for my money -- one of the greatest movie endings in recent years. Many of you will not feel that way, but you will have strong feelings one way or the other, and that's awesome.
***Special note for discussion of The Mist in the comments -- if you're going to spoil something, anything, slap a big ALL CAPS SPOILER ALERT in front of your comment so people know not to read it. You might hate something about the film, but don't ruin it for others. Thanks!
Which of these two movies star your boobs?
I do love John Cusack, but I don't have a lot of time to spend on mediocre
sad. Thanks for you honest review.
I haven't read The Mist since I was 12 or so but I remember it being long,
well, obviously not long for a Stephen King tale, but longer than short at
least? What qualifies as a short story?
Now I want to reread it although I don't think I'll get around to seeing
the movie.
Couldn't agree with you more about "The Mist", man - I think that ending is
what makes the flick a classic. But overall it's just a fantastic horror
movie. It's funny, though; I've read other comments elsewhere that say
shit like "oh, this is just more of Stephen King's anti-religion hatred
rearing its ugly head" and whatnot, but it seems crystal clear to me that
it's not religion or spirituality the man has a problem with - it's
FANATICISM. Which, as most forward-thinking people know, is one of the
most dangerous things out there (and yes, stands neck and neck with
monsters from hell).
Missed Lions For Lambs but intend to catch it at home. Even if it's not
completely successful, I can't fault anyone for trying to interject real
IDEAS into a movie, make people think and talk about things. And Grace Is
Gone, well - that sounds kinda sad and depressing. I'll probably end up
watching it with my Mom sometime when she feels like having a "good cry,"
so thanks for the warning.
I've heard a lot of crap about THE MIST, but I'm probably gonna go see it
based off your recommendation.
I sincerely disagree about The Mist. I thought it was crap. I thought that
the ending left a certain actor hanging out to dry without even a score to
back him up, while he flailed in vane to add emotional heft to the film. My
audience laughed in incredulity. I just am not that impressed by the "ooh,
psycho christian nut jobs are evil!" theme of the movie. SPOILER they even
backed off of that line when they had the guy who dispatches the crazy lady
(legitimately, she was responsible for inciting murder) get killed randomly
almost immediately afterward. I felt this this movie was a true Stephen
King Movie, meaning, it had all the flaws of his writing intact. The movie
has that making-it-up-as-it-goes vibe so prevalent in King's work. The
monsters are in the mist, they evaporate on death, no wait, they're from an
alternate universe. There are three army duds here, and they just happen to
be the biggest fucking worthless pussies in the whole US armed forces. The
ending just was not earned by the filmmaker. I mean, seemingly as long as
they stay in that car, they're bulletproof. nothing ever attacks them
unless the script needs it to. Everything that happens in this happens
because it says so in the script, not because it's logical.
Pat I've noticed that you never give a movie an F. Could you give me an
example of a movie that you would give an F.