, , , , , , , ,
Patrick Walsh

I like to move it. Move it.

Fall Movie Review Roundup: 'Gangster,' 'Devil,' Vampires

posted Monday, 12 November 2007

Still playing catch-up on movie reviews post-cleanse. Today, three violent new flicks...

AMERICAN GANGSTER (B+)

Denzel Washington in Universal Pictures' American Gangster

Russell Crowe plays a detective trying to bring down heroin kingpin Frank Lucas (Denzel Washington) in 1970's Harlem.

American Gangster stalls just short of classic gangster movie status. I can't point to anything particularly wrong with the film, it just lacks that certain zip and freshness you get from a Godfather, a Goodfellas, a Brasco.

Great flick, though. It runs nearly three hours and breezes by in what feels like half that. It's expertly paced, and every scene earns its place (rhyme). The recreation of 70's NYC is beautifully done. The script, by the great Steven Zaillian (Awakenings, Schindler's List), doesn't hit a false note. The huge, fine, sprawling supporting cast offers more "hey, it's...that guy!" moments than any other film this year. And Crowe and Washington, easily two of the best actors working, give typically great -- if somewhat familiar -- performances. As with DeNiro and Pacino in Heat, the nature of the story has them only sharing a precious few scenes, and you wind up wanting a lot more.

I walked out of this film on a high, dazzled and excited. But within about an hour, it had pretty much vanished from my mind. Ridley Scott is a technical master, but his films never stick with me. There is so much to recommend here, but ultimately it's a crime tale bogged down by the feeling of "been there, seen that, better then."

BEFORE THE DEVIL KNOWS YOU'RE DEAD (A-)

 Philip Seymour Hoffman and Ethan Hawke in THINKFilm's Before the Devil Knows You're Dead

One of the all-time great directors, Sidney Lumet (12 Angry Men, Dog Day Afternoon, Network), is still churning out classics at 83 years old.

Ethan Hawke is a complete loser who can't afford child support or anything else. His brother, Philip Seymour Hoffman, isn't doing much better, but he has a plan. He wants Hawke, the weaker brother by a landslide, to rob their parents' jewelry store. The parents collect the insurance money, the brothers get the loot, and everyone comes away happy. Sure they do. 

Things go spectacularly wrong of course, and the movie uses a surprisingly successful gimmick of blasting you back, day-by-day, through the time before the robbery. Considering how much time-shifting goes on, the whole thing is remarkably easy to follow -- credit first-time screenwriter Kelly Masterson. It's a dark, nasty, thrilling little ride. 

Hoffman is better here than he was in his showy, Oscar-winning role in Capote. Hawke, always an underrated actor, is perfect as the weak, wounded brother. Albert Finney is outstanding as their cold, detached father. And Marisa Tomei...hang on, let me start a new paragraph.

I never thought much one way or the other of Marisa Tomei, but now I think she may be the hottest actress in the game. She is naked for a good 20 minutes in Devil, and the nudity almost caused me to lose consciousness. It brought me back to the feeling of looking at the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue in my clubhouse. What a body -- my Christ. My Christ. Sorry.

Considerably less hot? The Philip Seymour Hoffman nudity that kicks off the film. If you can survive that, the bloodshed ahead should be a breeze. 

Anyway, don't let this pitch-black moral tale pass you by. If you can't catch it in the theater, put it in your Netflix now. Devil is a hell of a picture.

30 DAYS OF NIGHT (C)

 Danny Huston in Columbia Pictures' 30 Days of Night

It's a shame that some of the most stunning visuals in film tend to be wasted on weak, underdeveloped stories. Think The Cell. Think the fucktarded 300. And now, think 30 Days of Night.

30 Days is an absolutely beautiful film. Every shot looks like a painting. There's an overhead shot of of vampires feasting on the town that is one of my favorite movie moments of the year. But screenwriters Steve Niles, Stuart Beattie, and Brian Nelson give you absolutely nothing to...sink your teeth into. Thank you.

Directed by David Slade (the sweet thriller Hard Candy) and based on a graphic novel (never words I'm happy to see in a movie's credits), 30 Days has a terrific setup. An Alaskan town goes dark for 30 days each year, and this year, they've got to survive vampire attacks until the sun comes back. But the attacks are fairly weak, the vampires lack personality, and the story just ain't there. The actors are total voids. Only Ben Foster, scene stealer extraordinaire, manages to inject some life into the proceedings. You know you're in trouble when your movie's hero is Josh Harnett -- an actor I've long argued is hiding the fact that he has Down's Syndrome.

Fangs for nothing. 

tags:                      

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit




1. RØB left...
Monday, 12 November 2007 4:20 pm :: http://www.pancakeproductions.net

I saw BEFORE THE DEVIL KNOWS YOU'RE DEAD last night at SLIFF and it was pretty good. In spite of the fact that I'd gone to bed at 4AM and woken up four hours later and not gone back to bed since (and had been in movie theatres all day), I didn't feel tired for any of it. It was really INTENSE!

However, to me, the "something-that-should-be-simple-but-gets-screwed-up-by -idiots-and-things-just-spiral-further-and-further-out-of-control" type dramas have already reached their apex. The feeling I got from watching DEVIL was the same one I got watching A SIMPLE PLAN when I saw it eight years ago or so. Good stuff, though--all of the portrayals are solid, and Marisa Tomei is indeed smokin' (but I thought she was smokin' in MY COUSIN VINNY, too). If any movie was ever "edge-of-your-seat" drama, this is it.


2. Nutsy Fagan left...
Monday, 12 November 2007 10:06 pm :: http://nutsyfagan.blog-city.com

God, you do make me miss my single (or rather childless) days in Manhattan when I went to the movies at least once a week....I went today and sat through Bee Movie. A few good laughs but more for adults than children.

I was wondering what the verdict would be on American Gangster. It sure looked like it had potential. Does Denzel ever do anything really bad? I will have to add BTDKYD to my Netflix list. I adore Ethan Hawke and Philip Seymour Hoffman. Lastly, I don't do horror flicks (except for Aliens, Silence of the Lambs types).

How are things going post-cleanse????


3. M. Kemper Brown left...
Tuesday, 13 November 2007 2:47 am

you had me until 30 days of night.

I can't comment on THAT film since I haven't seen it, but what's up with the disses on Fountain and 300. Wasn't the point of the latter to be an exercise in visual extravaganza. I didn't go to 300 for an intimate portrait of war and life in ancient greece. I wanted something awesome to look at for an hour and a half and good one-liner every now and again.On those counts it certainly delivered.

As for the Fountain, I felt that it was visually stunning (with no cgi, no less), and thematically rich. There's not much of a plot, i guess, but that's really not the point.


4. Patrick Walsh left...
Tuesday, 13 November 2007 3:39 am

Rob,

I agree that BTDKYD gave me many of the same feelings of A Simple Plan. I don't think it's that movie's equal, though. I consider Simple Plan one of the best movies of the 1990s.

Nutsy,

Can't you just leave the kids in the car? Crack a window or something? Denzel's never done anything REALLY bad, no. He's had a lame one here and there, (Bone Collector comes to mind) but never a disaster. He's great. Post-cleanse has been magic. Haven't put any weight back, still feel fantastic.

Brown,

300 sucked, but you did catch me in a mistake on The Fountain. I meant to write The Cell, and not even sure what made me pick that as an example, to be honest. Here's my Fountain review from last year -- I liked it!

http://patrickwalsh.blog-city.com/labyrinths_fountains_perfumes.htm

Darren Aronofsky is one of the most exciting directors working, and I hope someday we get to see him bring his skills to a traditional narrative. If The Fountain is confusing, it's only because there are so many big ideas here, and even when the "plot" doesn't quite hold together, it keeps you on board emotionally throughout. It's hard to explain, but essentially the main story is that of Hugh Jackman trying to find a cancer cure for his wife, played by Rachel Weisz. She is writing a book about the time of conquistadores, so we see Jackman and Weisz inserted into that world. And we also see a possible (I think) version of Jackman's future without her, a future which appears to include guzzling gallons of semen from a hair-covered tree. At least that's what I got out of it.

Many have called this movie completely incomprehensible, but it resonated with me and I feel like I understood what I needed to understand. It's basically a love story, and doesn't take the cheesy route of being "A love that stretches across time," as I was expecting. It's a movie you could teach a semester on and have discussion to spare, although that's not a class I'd want to take.

I hated Pi, but recognized a talented filmmaker at work. I saw Requiem For A Dream on a double date (!), and I didn't know if I'd make it through. Seeing it in a theater was almost too much, each time that refrigerator lunged forward and made that horrible noise, my heart felt like it was going to give out. I stumbled out so exhausted, depressed, distressed, and shellshocked, I vowed I'd never see it again. Watching it again the other night (I'm a man of my vows) on a smaller scale, I realized what an incredible movie it is. The Fountain is a step sideways as opposed to forward, but it's a fascincating note in what's sure to be a fascinating career.

And it's really short! Which I appreciated, and is more than I can say for...


5. RØB left...
Tuesday, 13 November 2007 9:44 am :: http://www.pancakeproductions.net

Sorry if I gave the impression that I thought DEVIL was better than PLAN...definitely not the case. We are in agreement about A SIMPLE PLAN.

You know, awhile back I commented on a Cinematical post you made about who might play Kurt Cobain, and I said something like "ten years ago, I could see Ethan Hawke doing it, but now..." (that was the gist). I'd like to retract that statement. Not only do I think Ethan Hawke could do it now, but I think that, over the course of the past 13 years, Ethan Hawke has actually gotten younger-looking. Seriously, I thought he looked younger in DEVIL than he did in, say, REALITY BITES. How is that possible?

Anyway, I think he could totally do Cobain, if anyone could. He even sang that one song on the REALITY BITES soundtrack that was pretty grunge'd out.


6. Matt S. left...
Tuesday, 13 November 2007 10:04 am

For some reason, I couldn't love "Devil," and I wanted to so badly. But as opposed to a story like "Simple Plan" where the characters are so trapped that their situation becomes more and more dire, the brothers in this movie seem to just be making unrelatable, unmotivated poor decisions. So the bloodshed and fury at the end of the film didn't come off with the tragic power it should have; it just felt pitiful.

Well acted? Sure. Comptenetly directed? Definitely. But the chopped up timeline felt like a film-school gimmick to me - or worse, an effort in the cutting room to save a story that lacked momentum. I could be wrong - maybe the structure was all there in the original script, but it's equally possible to take a linear crime plot re-edit it Tarantino-style to drum up some suspense. In that case, kudos to the editor - but Lumet has told so many perfectly paced linear thrillers that he shouldn't need to resort to that.


7. Patrick Walsh left...
Tuesday, 13 November 2007 2:40 pm

ROB,

Sorry if I gave the impression that I thought that you thought Devil was better than Plan. Agreed on Hawke/Cobain, though I still think the movie is a bad idea. And I loved Hawke's Reality Bites song "I'm Nuthin." AND his pretty cool Violent Femmes cover. Dear God, maybe I love Ethan Hawke?

Matt,

I kind of dug the pitiful aspect of it, that's what made it feel fresh to me. It was so sad and pathetic and dark, especially Hoffman's actions at the end. Understand your POV though. And I hear you on the time-shifting, I'm usually not a fan (it knocked Michael Clayton out of 'A' status for me), but I loved it here. Show them in a horrible situation, show how they got there. I can almost guarantee it was there in the original script.


8. sam left...
Tuesday, 13 November 2007 2:40 pm :: http://craftysam.blogspot.com

i love ethan hawke even if he is a cheating rat bastard. i will check out 'devil' for sure.


9. Chris Vaughn left...
Tuesday, 13 November 2007 3:27 pm

One thing I didn't like about Gangster was I felt Washington was type-casted. And I feel like in almost EVERY movie Washington is in, he has to say a varient of "Heh heh.. My man". I felt like it was the guy from Training Day.

Also, why did you think 300 sucked?


10. Patrick Walsh left...
Wednesday, 14 November 2007 1:55 am

Sam,

Cheating on Uma Thurman no less. Just proves the old adage that a guy can get tired of screwing anyone...

Chris,

Yeah, Washington plays a lot of similar roles, but there simply is no one who does his "thing" as well as him.

Here's my 300 review, I probably enjoyed "30 Days" slightly more: http://pa trickwalsh.blog-city.com/diggers_shooters_swimmers_and_spartans.htm


11. RØB left...
Wednesday, 14 November 2007 10:02 am :: http://www.pancakeproductions.net

Good call, Chris...I started cracking up when I read the "Heh heh...my man!" thing (and again, just now, thinking about it). It's so true! I bet he even works it in someplace in GLORY.