Today, two huge movies with huge casts and huge aspirations. Can too much ambition ever be a bad thing?
Oh my Lord, yes.
SOUTHLAND TALES (D+)

As Southland Tales began, there were 25 people in my theater. When it ended, there were six, and at least two of them (the two in my row) were sound asleep. I could almost end the review right there, no?
Southland Tales is an absolute disfuckstermess, easily among the worst movies of the year. What makes its suckitude so difficult to swallow is that its writer/director, Richard Kelly, made Donnie Darko, one of the more exciting debut films in recent memory.
Darko is one of my favorites, a mind-bending blend of David Lynch, Robert Zemeckis, John Hughes, and Steven Spielberg. It's everything great about 1980s movies, updated and wrapped in a surprisingly deep package. Darko's mystery and occasional incoherence was a big part of its charm, but Southland is all incoherence, all the time. All that was special about Darko is stretched and poked and vomited up again times a thousand here, and it's a mighty sad affair. Kelly is tackling political issues he doesn't seem to understand, and his "satirical" sequences feel empty and stupid. It's a classic case of everyone telling a guy how great he is, to the point where he believes he can do whatever the hell he wants. Southland is a film Kelly was simply not ready to make.
Here's a small sampling of the cast: The Rock, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Mandy Moore, Jon Lovitz, Nora Dunn, Cheri Oteri, John Larroquette, a never-more-irritating Amy Poehler, Seann William Scott (in a dual role!), Curtis Armstrong (Booger!), Christopher Lambert (Christopher Lambert!), Bai Ling, Wallace Shawn (over-acting, by Wallace Shawn standards!), and -- sigh -- Justin Timberlake (who must be stopped, now). Many more make appearances, but doesn't that give you an idea of what you're in for here? It's as though everyone in the film was Kelly's nineteenth choice. It's as if Kelly's direction consisted of yelling the words "Be more grating!" over and over.
Everyone in the cast gives a terrible performance, and for this many performers to be this bad, the fault lies with the director. How are they supposed to act? This script must have read like stereo instructions. If Kelly can't decide on a tone, how can the actors? They can't, and they don't. They all perform as if they're in their own movie, and I'll bet if we were allowed to see the 10 seconds of film after "Cut!" was yelled, each actor would turn to the camera and say, "Is that what you wanted?"
I thought about summarizing the plot, but I gave up. I can tell you it may be set in the near future. There might be time travel. The government is perhaps involved. A group is likely trying to harness the power of the Earth's oceans. And I can nearly confirm that Justin Timberlake lip-synchs to The Killers. I don't know if any of that actually happened or not, not sure if Kelly does or not, very sure I don't care.
There are people who will claim at year's end that this is some sort of lost masterpiece and that they "get it" and no one else does. These people will always be around. I went to film school with them, and they are idiots. I would love to lock these guys in a room with Southland Tales on repeat and see how long they last.
ACROSS THE UNIVERSE (C)

Across the Universe has many of the same problems as Southland, although it's a much more watchable film. It's a pretty simple love story, blown up to needlessly epic proportions and communicated through Beatles songs. It isn't as headachey and exhausting as Moulin Rouge (what is?), although that film was clearly an influence, particularly on the male lead Jim Sturgess -- who appears to be mimicking Ewan McGregor's singing voice. (Because really, who better to model your voice after than a master vocalist like...Ewan McGregor?)
Broadway shows have taken a depressing turn lately -- the big trend is "jukebox musicals." These are shows that construct a barely-there story around a popular artists' hits, as opposed to having someone write original songs. The thinking is that "those stupid tourists" will only listen to songs they already know, which is ludicrous, and a lot of the "jukebox musicals" are critical and commercial flops. In less than a year, I saw shows based around The Four Seasons (Jersey Boys, the best of the bunch), ABBA (Mamma Mia, obviously awesome) Billy Joel (Movin' Out, fairly ridiculous) John Lennon (Lennon, eh), Elvis Presley (All Shook Up, weak), and Johnny Cash (Ring of Fire, an abortion). Beach Boys and Bob Dylan musicals have also come and gone.
Across the Universe is no more groundbreaking than any of those shows, though the filmmakers certainly seem to think they're making something of great importance. The director, Julie Taymor, comes from Broadway, and she's got some sweet visuals, but the story is pitiful and the way she takes you into the songs couldn't be more thuddingly obvious.
Scene after scene goes about like this:
GUY: Hey, this reminds me of that time we hung out with Lucy!
GIRL: Lucy? You don't mean Lucy in the Sky?
GUY: With Diamonds! Yeah, that's the one!
GIRL: 2-3-4!
It gets real old, real fast.
GUY: What's that you say?
GIRL: I say I want a revolution!
GUY: You say you want a revolution?
GIRL: 2-3-4!
I think you get the idea, but just incase...
GUY: These strawberries are delicious!
GIRL: I know! I could hang out in Strawberry Fields...
GUY: Forever!
GIRL: 2-3-4!
That's basically the movie. There are moments that are about perfect -- the high school cheerleader singing "I Want to Hold Your Hand" is a highlight of Universe and of 2007 film in general. But too many sequences are either dull and uninspired or, in the case of Bono's "I Am the Walrus" and Eddie Izzard's "Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite," painful and cringe-inducing.
"Love Me Do?" More like "Love Me Don't!"
Thank you.
Nice. I know you occasionally ask in your movie review posts if we've seen
anything lately. Myself, I've seen something like 11 movies in the past
week, and yes, I feel like Pat Walsh. (SLIFF was this week, is the main
reason)
Thank you, thank you! I've read so many good reviews of Across the Universe
(Ebert, etc.) and was so confused. It was basically Hair but with no
original songs.
And how they named a character Prudence solely so they could coax her out
of the bathroom??? Ugh!
But you know, it still entertained me somewhat.
Hilarious reviews. I'm sure I'll regret it, but I'll probably see Southland
Tales anyway, as an act of masochism. I'm just so curious, like "How bad
can it be?" Of course, that's the same question I asked about Irreversible,
the TwoGirlsOneCup video, and The Shaggy Dog w/Tim Allen. The answer:
painfully, soul-crushingly bad.
"There are people who will claim at year's end that this is some sort of
lost masterpiece and that they 'get it' and no one else does. These people
will always be around. I went to film school with them, and they are
idiots."
Amazing that "Southland Tales" even got released - I remember reading that
the Cannes screening was full of groans and walkouts, and no interest from
any distributor. Kelly was then quoted as saying basically that he had no
idea what to do about his career now. I suppose a studio probably recut it
and hopes to get a few tickets sold based on a trailer that says "the
writer/director of Donnie Darko." I think I'll skip this one.
Can't say I had much desire to see either of these two. The first looks
dumb and as for the second, if I'm going to watch a movie with Beatles
music, it's going to be a Beatles movie.
Wallace Shawn??? Overacting??? INCONCEIVABLE!
I was really looking forward to Southland Tales, until everyone I know told
me how shitty it was. Oh well. But Across the Universe, as Nutsy said "if
I'm going to watch a movie with Beatles music, it's going to be a Beatles
movie."
You are a pretentious dick. WOW DONNIE DARKO WAS SO DEEP AND INTELLECTUAL
AND ANYTHING WITH LESS IS CRAP. "Why are you wearing that stupid man
suit?" Seriously? C'mon. And i'd like you, with your apparently perfect
pitch, to go and do Jim Sturgess's job. The movie was simple and sweet
with good music. It doesn't NEED to be any more than that. I mean if all
you are going to do is try to put it up against other stuff and tear it to
crap, go watch your needlessly complicated films with all those fancy lines
and dialogue that make you feel like you understand the universe just a
little bit more than everyone else. Try something new. Step out of your
little box lined w/ conspiracy theories and things you think you know, and
just appreciate the world.